As I scroll through my messages I find photos of an exhibition I
attended last Thursday. Sir Leigh and I saw two very different but significant
players in Irish art. I feel an art critic moment coming on as my general
anaesthetic does its wonders.
We decided to see John Doherty's show at the Taylor first, where
his familiar and precisely rendered relics of Irish towns and villages are on
show. From bookies to sweetshops to petrol pumps, his work may be acutely and
architecturally conscious of linear detail, light and shade, but it is his mastery
of colour that raises his quotidian subjects to quiet heroics.
Elsewhere, his treatment of the sea and its artefacts is as heroic
as the little shops he foregrounds. The 'Buoys' series is a study in the
dominant form, tactile engineering and rusted rivets fully realised, while the
subordinate coils of rope and loops of chain sit like ghosts, bit players in
the frame, their unadulterated form laid bare for contemplation.
Many red stickers later, John was in positive mood, with a show in
Sydney on the horizon.
There are works on paper, and his bronzes, but for sheer diversity,
for Damien Hirst-style response, there’s Consumer
Landscape, an installation of painted cans encased in open timber boxes.
I meet the blonde barrister/writer and note a few more from the
bar in the room, I ask is it a bar outing and she reminds me the artist's wife
is a barrister, aha. I wonder if there’s a collective noun for them, an
argument of, a brief of?
Having spent the previous afternoon down at the Courts with my
very first legal counsel and conducted an interview on Tuesday about my 2006
case in the European Court of Human Rights, I'm wondering, yet again, if this
could be a new career. Another couple of years study, while I write. Who knows?
No comments:
Post a Comment